SCMB vs. OILK
SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCMB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCMB returned 3.37%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. SCMB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
SCMB vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCMB achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
SCMB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SCMB vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 1.07% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMB and OILK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | -0.12 |
The correlation between SCMB and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCMB vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCMB
OILK
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
SCMB
OILK
-
Real Estate
SCMB
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCMB
OILK
Technology
SCMB
OILK
-
Communication Services
SCMB
OILK
-
Utilities
SCMB
OILK
-
Industrials
SCMB
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
SCMB
OILK
-
Healthcare
SCMB
OILK
-
Basic Materials
SCMB
OILK
-
Energy
SCMB
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCMB vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
SCMB
OILK
SCMB vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCMB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 3.42 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 6.91 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCMB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.06 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.12 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
SCMB vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMB drawdown since its inception was -6.13%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMB and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -83.76% | +77.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -17.35% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.57% | -23.42% | +17.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -3.66% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -32.61% | +31.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 8.56% | -7.69% |
Volatility
SCMB vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) is 1.04%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that SCMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCMB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 10.44% | -9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.17% | 23.26% | -21.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94% | 28.75% | -25.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 30.12% | -25.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 35.97% | -31.81% |
SCMB vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCMB vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
SCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.54% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCMB and OILK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to SCMB (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMB dropped -6.13% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 19.03% vs 3.37% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 3.54% for SCMB.
SCMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while OILK is Oil & Gas. SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCMB and 0.68% for OILK.
SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCMB and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer