SCMB vs. MINO
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO).
SCMB and MINO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCMB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022. MINO is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Sep 8, 2021.
Performance
SCMB vs. MINO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCMB vs. MINO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | -0.33% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.50% | 4.42% | 3.13% | 8.46% | 2.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCMB achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than MINO's 0.50% return.
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MINO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCMB vs. MINO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MINO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCMB vs. MINO — Risk / Return Rank
SCMB
MINO
SCMB vs. MINO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCMB | MINO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.98 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.33 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 3.75 | -0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCMB | MINO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.98 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.26 | +0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMB and MINO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCMB vs. MINO - Dividend Comparison
SCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than MINO's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.45% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% |
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 3.86% | 3.71% | 3.91% | 3.78% | 2.87% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
SCMB vs. MINO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMB drawdown since its inception was -6.13%, smaller than the maximum MINO drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMB and MINO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMB | MINO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -15.24% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.79% | -3.83% | +0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -1.65% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -4.38% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 1.36% | -0.01% |
Volatility
SCMB vs. MINO - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) at 1.16%. This indicates that SCMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCMB | MINO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 1.16% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 1.77% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 4.67% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 4.60% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 4.60% | -0.39% |