PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MINO vs. PZT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MINO and PZT is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

MINO vs. PZT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.74%
-0.85%
MINO
PZT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MINO:

0.71

PZT:

0.08

Sortino Ratio

MINO:

0.98

PZT:

0.16

Omega Ratio

MINO:

1.13

PZT:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

MINO:

0.94

PZT:

0.06

Martin Ratio

MINO:

3.13

PZT:

0.36

Ulcer Index

MINO:

0.93%

PZT:

1.54%

Daily Std Dev

MINO:

4.07%

PZT:

6.50%

Max Drawdown

MINO:

-15.24%

PZT:

-22.73%

Current Drawdown

MINO:

-1.02%

PZT:

-5.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than PZT's 0.80% return.


MINO

YTD

0.91%

1M

0.70%

6M

0.74%

1Y

3.97%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PZT

YTD

0.80%

1M

0.80%

6M

-0.85%

1Y

2.98%

5Y*

0.37%

10Y*

2.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MINO vs. PZT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PZT's 0.28% expense ratio.


MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Expense ratio chart for MINO: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for PZT: current value at 0.28% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.28%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MINO vs. PZT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MINO is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MINO is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MINO is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MINO is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MINO is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MINO is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PZT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PZT is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PZT is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PZT is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PZT is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PZT is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PZT is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MINO vs. PZT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MINO, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.710.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for MINO, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.980.16
The chart of Omega ratio for MINO, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.131.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for MINO, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.940.07
The chart of Martin ratio for MINO, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.003.130.36
MINO
PZT

The current MINO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the PZT Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINO and PZT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.71
0.08
MINO
PZT

Dividends

MINO vs. PZT - Dividend Comparison

MINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than PZT's 3.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
3.86%3.91%3.78%2.87%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.05%3.04%2.82%2.66%2.77%2.55%2.73%3.01%2.94%3.37%3.40%3.75%

Drawdowns

MINO vs. PZT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINO drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum PZT drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINO and PZT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.02%
-4.60%
MINO
PZT

Volatility

MINO vs. PZT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) is 1.31%, while Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that MINO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.31%
2.44%
MINO
PZT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab