SCLZ vs. TLTX
SCLZ (Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCLZ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Swan, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCLZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
SCLZ vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCLZ achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -0.36% return.
SCLZ
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 16.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCLZ vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.46% | 7.04% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -0.36% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCLZ and TLTX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCLZ vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
SCLZ
TLTX
SCLZ vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCLZ | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCLZ | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.63 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
SCLZ vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCLZ drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLZ and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCLZ | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -6.35% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -4.05% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.27% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | — | — |
Volatility
SCLZ vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCLZ | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.13% | 9.14% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 9.14% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 9.14% | +2.21% |
SCLZ vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCLZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCLZ vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
SCLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, less than TLTX's 15.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 9.15% | 7.53% | 4.86% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 15.79% | 7.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCLZ and TLTX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SCLZ.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 15.79%, compared with 9.15% for SCLZ.
SCLZ is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Swan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SCLZ and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for SCLZ and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer