PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCLZ vs. IPDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCLZ vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCLZ

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.97%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.49%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IPDP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCLZ vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCLZ vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCLZ
SCLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SCLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IPDP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCLZ vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCLZIPDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

SCLZ vs. IPDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCLZIPDPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

Drawdowns

SCLZ vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCLZ drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLZ and IPDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCLZIPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

0.00%

-12.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

0.00%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

Volatility

SCLZ vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCLZIPDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

0.00%

+9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

0.00%

+11.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

0.00%

+11.35%

SCLZ vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCLZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCLZ vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

SCLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
9.15%7.53%4.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, SCLZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCLZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

SCLZ has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

They also come from different issuers: Swan and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SCLZ and 1.52% for IPDP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCLZ and IPDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer