PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKBAX vs. LKINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKBAX vs. LKINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX) and LKCM International Equity Fund (LKINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKBAX achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than LKINX's 10.46% return.


LKBAX

1D
0.97%
1M
1.89%
6M
2.71%
YTD
3.91%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
8.01%
ALL TIME*
6.90%

LKINX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.29%
6M
6.15%
YTD
10.46%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LKBAX vs. LKINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LKBAX
LKCM Balanced Fund
3.91%8.44%10.97%10.85%-13.86%14.01%15.28%7.63%
LKINX
LKCM International Equity Fund
10.46%21.87%4.83%16.10%-20.54%18.00%14.45%10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between LKBAX and LKINX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.79

The correlation between LKBAX and LKINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKBAX vs. LKINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LKBAX
LKBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LKBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LKBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LKINX
LKINX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LKBAX vs. LKINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX) and LKCM International Equity Fund (LKINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKBAXLKINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.05

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

7.51

-2.89

LKBAX vs. LKINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKBAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the LKINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKBAX and LKINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKBAX vs. LKINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKBAX drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum LKINX drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKBAX and LKINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKBAXLKINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-35.00%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.71%

-9.54%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.65%

-13.41%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.63%

-33.95%

+14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.91%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-7.33%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

2.60%

-1.10%

Volatility

LKBAX vs. LKINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX) is 2.00%, while LKCM International Equity Fund (LKINX) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that LKBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKBAXLKINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

3.09%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.66%

11.18%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.31%

13.64%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

17.32%

-6.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.86%

19.39%

-7.53%

LKBAX vs. LKINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKBAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than LKINX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKBAX vs. LKINX - Dividend Comparison

LKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than LKINX's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKBAX
LKCM Balanced Fund
5.82%6.00%4.60%3.49%3.59%4.41%4.18%5.95%3.02%4.09%5.06%3.50%
LKINX
LKCM International Equity Fund
1.19%1.32%1.40%1.45%4.00%1.24%0.19%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKBAX and LKINX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKINX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to LKBAX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKBAX dropped -31.40% vs LKINX's -35.00%.

LKINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKBAX and LKINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer