SCL vs. CDUAF
SCL (Stepan Company) and CDUAF (Canadian Utilities Limited) are both stocks. SCL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while CDUAF operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, SCL returned 1.56%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for CDUAF. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SCL vs. CDUAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCL achieves a 37.52% return, which is significantly higher than CDUAF's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SCL has underperformed CDUAF with an annualized return of 1.56%, while CDUAF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.88% annualized return.
SCL
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 14.93%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- YTD
- 37.52%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- -10.03%
- 5Y*
- -9.65%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.65%
CDUAF
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 26.63%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 51.07%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.27M | $2.89M | $1.49M | |
| $10.89M | $8.99M | $7.98M |
SCL vs. CDUAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCL Stepan Company | 37.52% | -24.60% | -30.29% | -9.74% | -12.91% | 5.24% | 17.75% | 39.96% | -5.21% | -2.06% |
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 31.32% | 35.10% | 6.34% | -6.25% | -1.87% | 25.16% | -14.69% | 37.49% | -19.67% | 15.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCL and CDUAF is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.11 |
The correlation between SCL and CDUAF shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SCL:
$1.46B
CDUAF:
$8.23B
SCL:
-$0.12
CDUAF:
CA$0.35
SCL:
0.60
CDUAF:
4.32
SCL:
1.21
CDUAF:
3.03
SCL:
$2.43B
CDUAF:
CA$3.54B
SCL:
$287.37M
CDUAF:
CA$1.15B
SCL:
$84.96M
CDUAF:
CA$1.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCL vs. CDUAF — Risk / Return Rank
SCL
CDUAF
SCL vs. CDUAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stepan Company (SCL) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCL | CDUAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.61 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 9.60 | -8.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.93 | 23.94 | -22.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCL vs. CDUAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCL drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, smaller than the maximum CDUAF drawdown of -71.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCL and CDUAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCL | CDUAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.78% | -71.22% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.78% | -5.35% | -27.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.02% | -13.56% | -40.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.48% | -31.94% | -32.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.78% | -41.92% | -24.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.41% | -9.04% | -39.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.15% | -39.68% | +22.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.81% | 2.14% | +13.67% |
Volatility
SCL vs. CDUAF - Volatility Comparison
Stepan Company (SCL) has a higher volatility of 14.58% compared to Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) at 5.29%. This indicates that SCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDUAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCL | CDUAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.58% | 5.29% | +9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.44% | 12.42% | +21.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.47% | 16.46% | +21.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 19.13% | +11.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 24.16% | +7.71% |
Dividends
SCL vs. CDUAF - Dividend Comparison
SCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than CDUAF's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 3.34% | 4.21% | 5.47% | 6.05% | 5.03% | 4.85% | 5.32% | 4.24% | 4.49% | 4.82% | 4.82% | 5.11% |
SCL Stepan Company | 2.45% | 3.27% | 2.33% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.06% | 0.95% | 1.47% |
Financials
SCL vs. CDUAF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stepan Company and Canadian Utilities Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCL vs. CDUAF - Profitability Comparison
SCL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stepan Company reported a gross profit of 99.98M and revenue of 684.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
CDUAF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a gross profit of 346.15M and revenue of 914.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
SCL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stepan Company reported an operating income of -28.23M and revenue of 684.11M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.
CDUAF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported an operating income of 271.12M and revenue of 914.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
SCL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stepan Company reported a net income of 22.91M and revenue of 684.11M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
CDUAF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a net income of 128.06M and revenue of 914.40M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCL and CDUAF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCL has higher volatility (14.58%) compared to CDUAF (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCL dropped -66.78% vs CDUAF's -71.22%.
CDUAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCL and CDUAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer