SCJIX vs. SEACX
Compare and contrast key facts about Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX).
SCJIX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Dec 13, 2017. SEACX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2004.
Performance
SCJIX vs. SEACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCJIX vs. SEACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCJIX Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund | -7.52% | 13.28% | 16.96% | 19.43% | -12.28% | 21.59% | 6.97% | 20.76% | -3.65% | -0.40% |
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund | -0.67% | 6.50% | 1.43% | 5.54% | -11.55% | -2.01% | 4.97% | 6.96% | -0.12% | 0.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCJIX achieves a -7.52% return, which is significantly lower than SEACX's -0.67% return.
SCJIX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -7.52%
- 6M
- -3.64%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- —
SEACX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCJIX vs. SEACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCJIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SEACX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCJIX vs. SEACX — Risk / Return Rank
SCJIX
SEACX
SCJIX vs. SEACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCJIX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.00 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 1.44 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 1.73 | -1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 5.83 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCJIX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.00 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.05 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.66 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCJIX and SEACX is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SCJIX vs. SEACX - Dividend Comparison
SCJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%, more than SEACX's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCJIX Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund | 10.71% | 9.18% | 12.61% | 8.45% | 9.53% | 25.39% | 15.45% | 7.00% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund | 3.36% | 2.72% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 1.67% | 1.41% | 1.86% | 2.26% | 2.22% | 1.98% | 2.18% | 2.30% |
Drawdowns
SCJIX vs. SEACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCJIX drawdown since its inception was -29.38%, which is greater than SEACX's maximum drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJIX and SEACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCJIX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.38% | -16.96% | -12.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -2.62% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.12% | -16.34% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.52% | -2.17% | -6.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -2.41% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 0.78% | +1.54% |
Volatility
SCJIX vs. SEACX - Volatility Comparison
Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) at 1.62%. This indicates that SCJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCJIX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 1.62% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.54% | 2.52% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 4.11% | +10.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 4.82% | +7.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 3.88% | +11.10% |