PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCJ vs. VBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCJ vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly higher than VBIL's 1.71% return.


SCJ

1D
-1.98%
1M
0.36%
YTD
14.43%
6M
14.21%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
7.94%

VBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCJ vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCJ and VBIL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCJ vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCJ
SCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCJ vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCJVBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-109.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

39.66

-38.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

296.41

-293.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

1,960.46

-1,952.16

SCJ vs. VBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the VBIL Sharpe Ratio of 18.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCJ and VBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCJ vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and VBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCJVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-0.09%

-43.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-0.01%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

0.00%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-0.00%

-10.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

0.00%

+3.62%

Volatility

SCJ vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that SCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCJVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

0.05%

+4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

0.16%

+13.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

0.22%

+16.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

0.30%

+15.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.27%

0.30%

+15.97%

SCJ vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCJ vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison

SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than VBIL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
2.80%3.14%1.79%1.99%1.18%1.87%0.89%1.85%1.44%1.45%2.73%1.53%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.65%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCJ and VBIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCJ has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to VBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJ dropped -43.52% vs VBIL's -0.09%.

On 1-year performance, SCJ leads with 29.99% vs 3.91% for VBIL. On fees, VBIL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCJ has performed better with a 29.99% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBIL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SCJ.

VBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 2.80% for SCJ.

SCJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while VBIL is Ultrashort Bond. SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while VBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.07% for VBIL.

VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.07 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCJ and VBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer