PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCJ vs. EZJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCJ vs. EZJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly lower than EZJ's 25.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed EZJ with an annualized return of 7.94%, while EZJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.


SCJ

1D
-1.98%
1M
0.36%
YTD
14.43%
6M
14.21%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
7.94%

EZJ

1D
-8.84%
1M
2.37%
YTD
25.72%
6M
24.31%
1Y
62.30%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCJ vs. EZJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
14.43%29.58%3.41%13.22%-12.75%-2.95%7.46%16.16%-17.17%31.61%
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
25.72%42.72%3.31%30.78%-38.23%-1.96%22.21%33.76%-30.99%49.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SCJ and EZJ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009

0.81

The correlation between SCJ and EZJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCJ vs. EZJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCJ
EZJ

Industrials

27.0%
24.5%

Consumer Cyclical

15.2%
11.9%

Technology

13.9%
20.8%

Financial Services

10.0%
17.8%

Basic Materials

9.3%
3.0%

Real Estate

7.7%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
3.5%

Healthcare

5.3%
5.9%

Communication Services

2.8%
8.8%

Utilities

1.9%
1.0%

Energy

0.7%
1.0%

Industrials

SCJ
27.0%
EZJ
24.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCJ
15.2%
EZJ
11.9%

Technology

SCJ
13.9%
EZJ
20.8%

Financial Services

SCJ
10.0%
EZJ
17.8%

Basic Materials

SCJ
9.3%
EZJ
3.0%

Real Estate

SCJ
7.7%
EZJ
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCJ
6.3%
EZJ
3.5%

Healthcare

SCJ
5.3%
EZJ
5.9%

Communication Services

SCJ
2.8%
EZJ
8.8%

Utilities

SCJ
1.9%
EZJ
1.0%

Energy

SCJ
0.7%
EZJ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCJ vs. EZJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCJ
SCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EZJ
EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCJ vs. EZJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCJEZJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.34

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

7.05

+1.25

SCJ vs. EZJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the EZJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCJ and EZJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCJ vs. EZJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, smaller than the maximum EZJ drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and EZJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCJEZJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-58.63%

+15.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-26.78%

+14.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-31.48%

+19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

-58.63%

+25.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

-58.63%

+19.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-8.84%

+6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-21.24%

+10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

8.86%

-5.24%

Volatility

SCJ vs. EZJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) is 4.97%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a volatility of 16.55%. This indicates that SCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCJEZJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

16.55%

-11.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

34.12%

-20.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

42.16%

-25.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

37.15%

-21.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.27%

34.75%

-18.48%

SCJ vs. EZJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EZJ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCJ vs. EZJ - Dividend Comparison

SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than EZJ's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
1.64%1.13%2.09%1.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.24%4.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
2.80%3.14%1.79%1.99%1.18%1.87%0.89%1.85%1.44%1.45%2.73%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCJ and EZJ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZJ has higher volatility (16.55%) compared to SCJ (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJ dropped -43.52% vs EZJ's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, EZJ leads with 10.97% vs 7.94% for SCJ. On fees, SCJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SCJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 10.97% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

SCJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.64% for EZJ.

SCJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while EZJ is Leveraged Equities. SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.95% for EZJ.

SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCJ and EZJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer