SCJ vs. EZJ
SCJ (iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF) and EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) are both exchange-traded funds - SCJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while EZJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCJ returned 7.55%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for EZJ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EZJ.
Performance
SCJ vs. EZJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than EZJ's 28.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed EZJ with an annualized return of 7.55%, while EZJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.
SCJ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
EZJ
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 12.78%
- YTD
- 28.79%
- 6M
- 31.91%
- 1Y
- 58.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
SCJ vs. EZJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 14.35% | 29.58% | 3.41% | 13.22% | -12.75% | -2.95% | 7.46% | 16.16% | -17.17% | 31.61% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 28.79% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -30.99% | 49.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCJ and EZJ is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2009 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SCJ and EZJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCJ vs. EZJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCJ
EZJ
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
SCJ
EZJ
Consumer Cyclical
SCJ
EZJ
Technology
SCJ
EZJ
Basic Materials
SCJ
EZJ
Financial Services
SCJ
EZJ
Real Estate
SCJ
EZJ
Consumer Defensive
SCJ
EZJ
Healthcare
SCJ
EZJ
Communication Services
SCJ
EZJ
Utilities
SCJ
EZJ
Energy
SCJ
EZJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCJ vs. EZJ — Risk / Return Rank
SCJ
EZJ
SCJ vs. EZJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCJ | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.48 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 2.09 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.19 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 6.72 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCJ | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.48 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.21 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.31 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.23 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SCJ vs. EZJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, smaller than the maximum EZJ drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and EZJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCJ | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.52% | -58.63% | +15.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -26.78% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.43% | -31.48% | +19.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.25% | -58.63% | +25.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | -58.63% | +19.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -4.25% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -21.29% | +10.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 8.72% | -5.13% |
Volatility
SCJ vs. EZJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) is 4.03%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that SCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCJ | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 8.67% | -4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.13% | 30.75% | -17.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 39.75% | -23.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 36.59% | -20.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 34.54% | -18.25% |
SCJ vs. EZJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EZJ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCJ vs. EZJ - Dividend Comparison
SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than EZJ's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.60% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 2.75% | 3.14% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.18% | 1.87% | 0.89% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCJ and EZJ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZJ has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to SCJ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJ dropped -43.52% vs EZJ's -58.63%.
On 10-year performance, EZJ leads with 10.74% vs 7.55% for SCJ. On fees, SCJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SCJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.
SCJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.60% for EZJ.
SCJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while EZJ is Leveraged Equities. SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.95% for EZJ.
SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCJ and EZJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer