PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SCJ is traded in USD, while CJP.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CJP.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than CJP.NEO's 17.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed CJP.NEO with an annualized return of 7.55%, while CJP.NEO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


SCJ

1D
0.36%
1M
5.04%
YTD
14.35%
6M
16.37%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
7.55%

CJP.NEO

1D
0.06%
1M
7.14%
YTD
17.82%
6M
23.71%
1Y
49.27%
3Y*
28.76%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
14.35%29.58%3.41%13.22%-12.75%-2.95%7.46%16.16%-17.17%31.61%
CJP.NEO
iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
17.82%36.93%16.73%38.10%-3.26%19.06%2.18%18.77%-23.77%29.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SCJ and CJP.NEO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2009

0.62

The correlation between SCJ and CJP.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCJ
SCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

CJP.NEO
CJP.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CJP.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCJCJP.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

2.67

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

3.62

-0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

4.13

-1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.42

15.66

-7.24

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the CJP.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCJ and CJP.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCJCJP.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.67

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.95

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.69

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.37

-0.07

Drawdowns

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, roughly equal to the maximum CJP.NEO drawdown of -45.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and CJP.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCJCJP.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-45.01%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-12.00%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-21.79%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

-21.79%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

-45.01%

+6.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

0.00%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-13.36%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.16%

+0.43%

Volatility

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) at 3.29%. This indicates that SCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CJP.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCJCJP.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.29%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

13.49%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

18.53%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

20.70%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

22.36%

-6.07%

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CJP.NEO's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Dividend Comparison

SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than CJP.NEO's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CJP.NEO
iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.24%1.48%1.71%1.24%1.96%1.56%1.97%2.42%2.38%1.48%0.97%0.84%
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
2.75%3.14%1.79%1.99%1.18%1.87%0.89%1.85%1.44%1.45%2.73%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCJ and CJP.NEO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CJP.NEO.

SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while CJP.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.71% for CJP.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCJ and CJP.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer