SCJ vs. CJP.NEO
SCJ (iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF) and CJP.NEO (iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Japan Equities funds from iShares - SCJ tracks the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index while CJP.NEO tracks the FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCJ returned 7.55%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for CJP.NEO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for CJP.NEO.
Performance
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SCJ is traded in USD, while CJP.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CJP.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than CJP.NEO's 17.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed CJP.NEO with an annualized return of 7.55%, while CJP.NEO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
SCJ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
CJP.NEO
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 23.71%
- 1Y
- 49.27%
- 3Y*
- 28.76%
- 5Y*
- 19.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 14.35% | 29.58% | 3.41% | 13.22% | -12.75% | -2.95% | 7.46% | 16.16% | -17.17% | 31.61% |
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 17.82% | 36.93% | 16.73% | 38.10% | -3.26% | 19.06% | 2.18% | 18.77% | -23.77% | 29.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCJ and CJP.NEO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2009 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SCJ and CJP.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
SCJ
CJP.NEO
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCJ | CJP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.67 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 3.62 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 4.13 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 15.66 | -7.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCJ | CJP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.67 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.95 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.69 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.37 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, roughly equal to the maximum CJP.NEO drawdown of -45.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and CJP.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCJ | CJP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.52% | -45.01% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -12.00% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.43% | -21.79% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.25% | -21.79% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | -45.01% | +6.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | 0.00% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -13.36% | +2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.16% | +0.43% |
Volatility
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) at 3.29%. This indicates that SCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CJP.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCJ | CJP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 3.29% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.13% | 13.49% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 18.53% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 20.70% | -4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 22.36% | -6.07% |
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CJP.NEO's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCJ vs. CJP.NEO - Dividend Comparison
SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than CJP.NEO's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.24% | 1.48% | 1.71% | 1.24% | 1.96% | 1.56% | 1.97% | 2.42% | 2.38% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.84% |
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 2.75% | 3.14% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.18% | 1.87% | 0.89% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCJ and CJP.NEO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CJP.NEO.
SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while CJP.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.71% for CJP.NEO.
Find the right allocation for SCJ and CJP.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer