PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCIO vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCIO vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF (SCIO) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCIO achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.


SCIO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.90%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.85%
YTD
28.91%
6M
29.60%
1Y
51.55%
3Y*
26.27%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCIO vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCIO and GRID is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCIO vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCIO
SCIO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SCIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCIO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SCIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCIO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCIO vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF (SCIO) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCIOGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.42

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

16.72

-2.70

SCIO vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCIO and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCIOGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.67

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.51

0.57

+1.93

Drawdowns

SCIO vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCIO drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCIO and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCIOGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-40.56%

+38.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-11.73%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-1.33%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-8.43%

+8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

3.09%

-2.57%

Volatility

SCIO vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF (SCIO) is 0.85%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that SCIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCIOGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

7.95%

-7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

16.08%

-14.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

19.39%

-15.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.20%

21.00%

-17.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.20%

22.81%

-19.61%

SCIO vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCIO and GRID have an expense ratio of 0.70%.


Dividends

SCIO vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

SCIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
SCIO
First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF
5.99%6.31%6.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCIO and GRID have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to SCIO (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCIO dropped -1.72% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 1-year performance, GRID leads with 51.55% vs 7.23% for SCIO. Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. On volatility, SCIO has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GRID has performed better with a 51.55% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCIO and GRID have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.

SCIO has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.

SCIO is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCIO and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer