SCINX vs. SICNX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX).
SCINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jun 17, 1953. SICNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2008.
Performance
SCINX vs. SICNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCINX vs. SICNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCINX DWS CROCI International Fund | 1.17% | 44.99% | 2.37% | 18.85% | -13.29% | 9.30% | 3.00% | 21.45% | -14.47% | 22.01% |
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | -1.18% | 31.57% | 9.04% | 20.00% | -15.31% | 11.01% | 4.64% | 19.16% | -18.30% | 25.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCINX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than SICNX's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SCINX has outperformed SICNX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while SICNX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.05% annualized return.
SCINX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -10.46%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
SICNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCINX vs. SICNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCINX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SICNX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCINX vs. SICNX — Risk / Return Rank
SCINX
SICNX
SCINX vs. SICNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCINX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 0.99 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 1.34 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.40 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 5.20 | +2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCINX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 0.99 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.60 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.49 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.24 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCINX and SICNX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCINX vs. SICNX - Dividend Comparison
SCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCINX DWS CROCI International Fund | 2.72% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 3.55% | 3.48% | 3.89% | 1.80% | 3.39% | 3.73% | 2.49% | 3.76% | 3.52% |
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.42% | 2.86% | 1.03% | 3.56% | 2.86% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
SCINX vs. SICNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCINX drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, which is greater than SICNX's maximum drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCINX and SICNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCINX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.90% | -55.78% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -12.21% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.06% | -29.11% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.59% | -40.62% | +5.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.91% | -11.74% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.95% | -12.28% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.30% | +0.03% |
Volatility
SCINX vs. SICNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) is 5.61%, while Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that SCINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SICNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCINX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 7.41% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 12.85% | -2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 18.08% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 15.87% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 16.38% | -0.34% |