SCINX vs. SICNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCINX (DWS CROCI International Fund) and SICNX (Schwab International Core Equity Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SCINX returned 9.65%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for SICNX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCINX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SICNX.

Performance

SCINX vs. SICNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCINX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than SICNX's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SCINX has outperformed SICNX with an annualized return of 9.65%, while SICNX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.

SCINX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 12.22%
• 1Y: 32.10%
• 3Y*: 21.31%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: 9.65%

SICNX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 10.59%
• 6M: 7.48%
• 1Y: 22.77%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 10.21%
• 10Y*: 8.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCINX vs. SICNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCINX DWS CROCI International Fund	8.99%	44.99%	2.37%	18.85%	-13.29%	9.30%	3.00%	21.45%	-14.47%	22.01%
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund	10.59%	31.57%	9.04%	20.00%	-15.31%	11.01%	4.64%	19.16%	-18.30%	25.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SCINX and SICNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2008	0.91

The correlation between SCINX and SICNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCINX vs. SICNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCINX

SCINX Risk / Return Rank: 51
SCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

SICNX

SICNX Risk / Return Rank: 23
SICNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SICNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SICNX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SICNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SICNX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCINX vs. SICNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCINX	SICNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.33	+0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	1.80	+1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.25	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	1.81	+0.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.66	6.36	+2.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCINX vs. SICNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the SICNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCINX and SICNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCINX	SICNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	1.33	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.64	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.54	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.28	+0.06

Drawdowns

SCINX vs. SICNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCINX drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, which is greater than SICNX's maximum drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCINX and SICNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCINX	SICNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.90%	-55.78%	-8.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-12.21%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.23%	-13.53%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.06%	-29.11%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.59%	-40.62%	+5.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.02%	-1.23%	-2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.90%	-12.20%	-4.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.47%	+0.13%

Volatility

SCINX vs. SICNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) is 4.29%, while Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that SCINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SICNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCINX	SICNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	5.01%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.72%	14.27%	-3.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.92%	16.69%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	16.13%	-0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.08%	16.49%	-0.41%

SCINX vs. SICNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCINX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SICNX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCINX vs. SICNX - Dividend Comparison

SCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, while SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCINX DWS CROCI International Fund	2.52%	2.75%	3.20%	3.55%	3.48%	3.89%	1.80%	3.39%	3.73%	2.49%	3.76%	3.52%
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.61%	2.67%	3.42%	2.86%	1.03%	3.56%	2.86%	2.61%	2.50%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCINX and SICNX in my portfolio?

SCINX and SICNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCINX or SICNX?

SICNX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to SCINX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCINX dropped -63.90% vs SICNX's -55.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.