PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHZ vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHZ vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 15.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 1.52%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.


SCHZ

1D
0.26%
1M
0.92%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.69%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.52%

VXUS

1D
1.17%
1M
3.05%
YTD
15.66%
6M
16.85%
1Y
34.05%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHZ vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.64%7.24%1.26%5.60%-13.17%-1.72%7.46%8.65%-0.26%3.50%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
15.66%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHZ and VXUS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2011

-0.01

The correlation between SCHZ and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHZ vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHZ
SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHZ vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHZVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.94

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

11.32

-6.15

SCHZ vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHZ and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHZ vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHZVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-35.97%

+17.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-11.27%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

-13.58%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.01%

-29.44%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

-35.97%

+17.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

0.00%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-8.20%

+4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.92%

-1.99%

Volatility

SCHZ vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is 1.22%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that SCHZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHZVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

6.45%

-5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

14.12%

-11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

16.07%

-12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

16.22%

-10.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

17.20%

-11.78%

SCHZ vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHZ vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than VXUS's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.11%4.05%3.96%3.28%2.63%2.16%2.43%2.79%2.56%2.40%2.24%2.11%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.52%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHZ and VXUS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to SCHZ (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.00% vs 1.52% for SCHZ. On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VXUS.

SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 2.52% for VXUS.

SCHZ is categorized as Total Bond Market, while VXUS is Global Equities. SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHZ and 0.05% for VXUS.

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHZ and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer