SCHX vs. FSLSX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) are both funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while FSLSX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.08%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for FSLSX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FSLSX.

Performance

SCHX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 22.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed FSLSX with an annualized return of 15.08%, while FSLSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.

SCHX

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 25.11%
• 3Y*: 21.43%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: 15.08%

FSLSX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 22.06%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 31.41%
• 3Y*: 16.41%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: 11.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	8.26%	17.46%	24.88%	26.84%	-19.41%	26.81%	20.81%	31.22%	-4.66%	21.95%
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	22.06%	0.24%	9.25%	20.54%	-7.37%	33.32%	8.24%	34.54%	-16.90%	17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHX and FSLSX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009	0.86

The correlation between SCHX and FSLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SCHX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHX

SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 62
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FSLSX

FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHX	FSLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.70	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.26	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.25	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.66	10.59	+2.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHX	FSLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	1.70	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.45	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.52	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.54	+0.30

Drawdowns

SCHX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and FSLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHX	FSLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.33%	-69.87%	+35.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-9.79%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.04%	-26.81%	+7.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.41%	-26.81%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.33%	-47.98%	+13.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.91%	0.00%	-2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.97%	-8.27%	+4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.99%	-1.00%

Volatility

SCHX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) have volatilities of 3.85% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHX	FSLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	3.98%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	14.50%	-5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	18.70%	-6.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	20.50%	-3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.16%	21.91%	-3.75%

SCHX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.41%	2.49%	2.13%	7.29%	0.84%	4.84%	14.59%	6.57%	19.71%	1.26%
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.22%	1.39%	1.64%	1.22%	1.64%	1.82%	2.02%	1.70%	1.92%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHX and FSLSX in my portfolio?

SCHX and FSLSX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHX or FSLSX?

FSLSX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to SCHX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.