SCHX vs. EQL
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index while EQL tracks the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.03%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for EQL. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.
Performance
SCHX vs. EQL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHX having a 11.65% return and EQL slightly higher at 11.79%. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed EQL with an annualized return of 15.03%, while EQL has yielded a comparatively lower 12.40% annualized return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.61%
EQL
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.24M | $2.89M | $2.73M | |
| $244.71M | $275.73M | $370.20M |
SCHX vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.65% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 11.79% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and EQL is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SCHX and EQL shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHX vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
EQL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHX
EQL
Financial Services
SCHX
EQL
Communication Services
SCHX
EQL
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
EQL
Industrials
SCHX
EQL
Healthcare
SCHX
EQL
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
EQL
Energy
SCHX
EQL
Utilities
SCHX
EQL
Real Estate
SCHX
EQL
Basic Materials
SCHX
EQL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
EQL
SCHX vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHX | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.16 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | 12.39 | -1.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, roughly equal to the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and EQL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -35.65% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -6.19% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -15.07% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -19.24% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -35.65% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -3.23% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.58% | +0.56% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.29%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 2.29% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 7.09% | +3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 9.47% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 14.52% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 16.49% | +1.67% |
SCHX vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHX vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EQL's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.34% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and EQL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to EQL (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs EQL's -35.65%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.03% vs 12.40% for EQL. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 12.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.27% for EQL.
EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and EQL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer