SCHX vs. ACWV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.20%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for ACWV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

SCHX vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 15.20%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.

SCHX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 8.52%
• 1Y: 24.19%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

ACWV

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: 9.71%
• 5Y*: 5.30%
• 10Y*: 7.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHX vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	8.56%	17.46%	24.88%	26.84%	-19.41%	26.81%	20.81%	31.22%	-4.66%	21.95%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.59%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHX and ACWV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHX and ACWV has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHX vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHX	ACWV
Technology	38.3%	22.6%
Communication Services	10.1%	12.2%
Financial Services	9.9%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	5.1%
Industrials	8.4%	7.9%
Healthcare	8.4%	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	10.3%
Energy	3.2%	3.4%
Utilities	2.5%	7.8%
Real Estate	2.0%	0.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SCHX vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHX

SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 66
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 17
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 16
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHX vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHX	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	0.50	+1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	0.74	+1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.09	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	0.61	+2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.15	1.87	+10.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHX vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHX and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHX	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	0.50	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.52	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.59	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.70	+0.14

Drawdowns

SCHX vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHX	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.33%	-28.82%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-6.37%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.04%	-7.56%	-11.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.41%	-18.14%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.33%	-28.82%	-5.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-3.64%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.97%	-3.11%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	2.06%	-0.06%

Volatility

SCHX vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.09%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHX	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	2.09%	+1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	5.66%	+3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.27%	7.79%	+4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	10.24%	+6.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	12.31%	+5.86%

SCHX vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHX vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than ACWV's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.05%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.22%	1.39%	1.64%	1.22%	1.64%	1.82%	2.02%	1.70%	1.92%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHX and ACWV in my portfolio?

SCHX and ACWV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHX or ACWV?

SCHX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to ACWV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, SCHX or ACWV?

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.20% vs 7.26% for ACWV. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHX or ACWV?

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHX or ACWV?

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACWV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHX or ACWV?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.

What is the main difference between SCHX and ACWV?

SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.