SCHX vs. AAAGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and AAAGX (Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund) are both funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while AAAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.47%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for AAAGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for AAAGX.

Performance

SCHX vs. AAAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than AAAGX's 3.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has underperformed AAAGX with an annualized return of 15.47%, while AAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.52% annualized return.

SCHX

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 7.00%
• 1Y: 23.07%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 12.44%
• 10Y*: 15.47%

AAAGX

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 3.45%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 19.01%
• 3Y*: 24.16%
• 5Y*: 11.83%
• 10Y*: 17.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHX vs. AAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	8.04%	17.46%	24.88%	26.84%	-19.41%	26.81%	20.81%	31.22%	-4.66%	21.95%
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	3.45%	16.12%	39.55%	46.09%	-34.10%	22.05%	42.49%	31.64%	1.43%	24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHX and AAAGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009	0.92

The correlation between SCHX and AAAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCHX vs. AAAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHX

SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 56
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

AAAGX

AAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 18
AAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
AAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
AAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHX vs. AAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHX	AAAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.21	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	1.70	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.22	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	1.22	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.26	4.02	+7.24

SCHX vs. AAAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the AAAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHX and AAAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHX vs. AAAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum AAAGX drawdown of -64.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and AAAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHX	AAAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.33%	-64.98%	+30.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-16.76%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.04%	-23.44%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.41%	-40.41%	+15.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.33%	-40.41%	+6.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-2.82%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-23.83%	+19.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	5.07%	-3.02%

Volatility

SCHX vs. AAAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is 4.89%, while Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that SCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHX	AAAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	6.48%	-1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.94%	13.40%	-3.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	16.94%	-4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	22.88%	-5.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.16%	21.79%	-3.63%

SCHX vs. AAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAGX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHX vs. AAAGX - Dividend Comparison

SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than AAAGX's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	3.64%	3.77%	14.46%	3.55%	9.38%	6.93%	7.74%	5.39%	12.26%	0.00%	0.60%	0.00%
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.22%	1.39%	1.64%	1.22%	1.64%	1.82%	2.02%	1.70%	1.92%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHX and AAAGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SCHX and AAAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCHX or AAAGX?

AAAGX has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to SCHX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs AAAGX's -64.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.