SCHR vs. VTIP
SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while VTIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHR returned 1.19%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for VTIP. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTIP.
Performance
SCHR vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than VTIP's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHR has underperformed VTIP with an annualized return of 1.19%, while VTIP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.09% annualized return.
SCHR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.19%
VTIP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
SCHR vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.27% | 7.33% | 1.42% | 4.27% | -10.58% | -2.62% | 7.72% | 6.18% | 1.46% | 1.59% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.85% | 6.07% | 4.74% | 4.62% | -2.94% | 5.36% | 4.95% | 4.86% | 0.56% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHR and VTIP is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2012 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SCHR and VTIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.75 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHR vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank
SCHR
VTIP
SCHR vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHR | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.65 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 6.57 | -5.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 25.36 | -22.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHR vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and VTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHR | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -6.27% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -0.70% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.35% | -0.98% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.07% | -5.50% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | -6.27% | -9.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -0.22% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -1.04% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.18% | +0.81% |
Volatility
SCHR vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that SCHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHR | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 0.40% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 1.04% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 1.50% | +1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 2.77% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 2.74% | +1.73% |
SCHR vs. VTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VTIP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHR vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison
SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than VTIP's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 3.59% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHR and VTIP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHR has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to VTIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHR dropped -16.11% vs VTIP's -6.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTIP leads with 3.09% vs 1.19% for SCHR. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTIP has performed better with a 3.09% return vs 1.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHR.
SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.59% for VTIP.
SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while VTIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while VTIP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHR and 0.03% for VTIP.
VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHR and VTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer