SCHR vs. FLGB
SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while FLGB is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHR returned 0.02%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for FLGB. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. SCHR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLGB.
Performance
SCHR vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLGB's 6.90% return.
SCHR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.19%
FLGB
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHR vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.27% | 7.33% | 1.42% | 4.27% | -10.58% | -2.62% | 7.72% | 6.18% | 1.46% | -0.57% |
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 6.90% | 33.73% | 8.77% | 14.33% | -6.00% | 17.14% | -9.47% | 23.23% | -11.60% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHR and FLGB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | -0.00 |
The correlation between SCHR and FLGB shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHR vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank
SCHR
FLGB
SCHR vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHR | FLGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.92 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 6.84 | -3.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHR vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum FLGB drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and FLGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHR | FLGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -42.61% | +26.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -10.26% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.35% | -13.13% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.07% | -25.90% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -3.09% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -6.68% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 2.89% | -1.90% |
Volatility
SCHR vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) is 1.11%, while Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that SCHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHR | FLGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 5.27% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 12.30% | -9.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 14.48% | -11.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 16.67% | -11.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 18.97% | -14.50% |
SCHR vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHR vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison
SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than FLGB's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 3.27% | 3.50% | 4.42% | 3.95% | 4.23% | 2.93% | 2.67% | 4.30% | 3.92% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHR and FLGB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLGB has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to SCHR (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHR dropped -16.11% vs FLGB's -42.61%.
On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 10.82% vs 0.02% for SCHR. On fees, SCHR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 0.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLGB.
SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.27% for FLGB.
SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while FLGB is Europe Equities. SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHR and 0.09% for FLGB.
FLGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHR and FLGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer