SCHR vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. SCHR is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHR returned 2.92% vs 55.80% for BESF. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. SCHR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

SCHR vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 13.94% return.

SCHR

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 0.05%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 2.92%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: 0.21%
• 10Y*: 1.18%

BESF

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -8.03%
• YTD: 13.94%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 55.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHR vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	0.05%	4.00%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	13.94%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHR and BESF is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	-0.27

Return for Risk

SCHR vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHR

SCHR Risk / Return Rank: 24
SCHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
SCHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
SCHR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
SCHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SCHR Martin Ratio Rank: 24

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 81
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHR vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHR	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.28	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	3.08	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.37	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.05	5.11	-4.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.82	13.92	-11.10

SCHR vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHR Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHR and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHR vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHR	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.11%	-10.97%	-5.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-10.97%	+8.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-10.44%	+8.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-2.77%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	4.02%	-2.98%

Volatility

SCHR vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) is 1.16%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that SCHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHR	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	7.11%	-5.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.53%	15.05%	-12.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45%	24.70%	-21.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.39%	24.43%	-19.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.47%	24.43%	-19.96%

SCHR vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHR vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than BESF's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.97%	6.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	3.90%	3.85%	3.77%	3.16%	2.02%	1.00%	1.62%	2.31%	2.11%	1.65%	1.45%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHR and BESF in my portfolio?

SCHR and BESF have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHR or BESF?

BESF has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to SCHR (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHR dropped -16.11% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, SCHR or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 55.80% vs 2.92% for SCHR. On fees, SCHR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHR or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 55.80% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHR or BESF?

SCHR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHR or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 3.90% for SCHR.

What is the main difference between SCHR and BESF?

SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHR and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.