SCHQ vs. PRULX
SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and PRULX (T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, SCHQ returned -7.19%/yr vs -7.22%/yr for PRULX. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SCHQ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PRULX.
Performance
SCHQ vs. PRULX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly higher than PRULX's -3.80% return.
SCHQ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- -0.04%
- 5Y*
- -7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.12%
PRULX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- 6M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 1Y
- -0.98%
- 3Y*
- -0.15%
- 5Y*
- -7.22%
- 10Y*
- -1.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $13.53M | $14.79M | $18.63M |
SCHQ vs. PRULX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -2.90% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | -4.86% | 17.73% | -4.20% |
PRULX T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund | -3.80% | 6.69% | -5.71% | 2.90% | -30.45% | -5.22% | 18.34% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHQ and PRULX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SCHQ and PRULX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHQ vs. PRULX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHQ
PRULX
SCHQ vs. PRULX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund (PRULX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHQ | PRULX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.01 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.04 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 0.09 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHQ vs. PRULX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, roughly equal to the maximum PRULX drawdown of -47.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and PRULX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHQ | PRULX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.13% | -47.40% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -7.23% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -13.44% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.93% | -42.35% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.39% | -39.04% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.61% | -9.49% | -17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.17% | +0.06% |
Volatility
SCHQ vs. PRULX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund (PRULX) have volatilities of 2.30% and 2.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHQ | PRULX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 2.22% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | 6.53% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 8.91% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 14.55% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 13.92% | +1.28% |
SCHQ vs. PRULX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PRULX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHQ vs. PRULX - Dividend Comparison
SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than PRULX's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRULX T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund | 5.19% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 3.84% | 2.07% | 1.72% | 20.34% | 16.60% | 2.62% | 2.48% | 4.65% | 5.09% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.92% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SCHQ and PRULX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHQ has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to PRULX (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHQ dropped -46.13% vs PRULX's -47.40%.
PRULX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHQ and PRULX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer