PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRULX vs. SGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRULX vs. SGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund (PRULX) and DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRULX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than SGINX's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PRULX has underperformed SGINX with an annualized return of -0.51%, while SGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.05% annualized return.


PRULX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
-0.24%
5Y*
-5.46%
10Y*
-0.51%

SGINX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
1.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRULX vs. SGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRULX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund
-0.90%6.69%-5.71%2.90%-30.45%-5.22%18.34%22.58%-1.86%8.23%
SGINX
DWS GNMA Fund
0.21%7.88%0.59%4.93%-11.82%-1.12%3.29%6.65%0.42%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PRULX and SGINX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.70

The correlation between PRULX and SGINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRULX vs. SGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRULX
PRULX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PRULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRULX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PRULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRULX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SGINX
SGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRULX vs. SGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund (PRULX) and DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRULXSGINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.31

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.01

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

6.58

-4.17

PRULX vs. SGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRULX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the SGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRULX and SGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRULXSGINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.68

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

-0.01

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

0.22

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.76

-0.31

Drawdowns

PRULX vs. SGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRULX drawdown since its inception was -47.40%, which is greater than SGINX's maximum drawdown of -17.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRULX and SGINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRULXSGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.40%

-17.37%

-30.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-3.23%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-7.51%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.35%

-16.98%

-25.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.40%

-17.37%

-30.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.21%

-1.86%

-35.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-1.97%

-7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

0.98%

+1.73%

Volatility

PRULX vs. SGINX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund (PRULX) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) at 1.66%. This indicates that PRULX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRULXSGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

1.66%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.47%

2.84%

+3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.29%

3.85%

+5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.68%

6.44%

+8.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

4.82%

+9.16%

PRULX vs. SGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRULX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SGINX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRULX vs. SGINX - Dividend Comparison

PRULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than SGINX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRULX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund
5.33%5.21%4.88%3.84%2.07%1.72%20.34%16.60%2.62%2.48%4.65%5.09%
SGINX
DWS GNMA Fund
4.47%3.77%3.97%3.82%1.86%1.37%2.22%2.94%2.71%3.07%2.95%3.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRULX and SGINX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRULX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to SGINX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRULX dropped -47.40% vs SGINX's -17.37%.

SGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRULX and SGINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer