SCHQ vs. COMT
SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHQ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHQ returned -6.55%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for COMT. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. SCHQ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
SCHQ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 29.95% return.
SCHQ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- -0.87%
- 5Y*
- -6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 24.58%
- YTD
- 29.95%
- 1Y
- 33.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
SCHQ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -1.31% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | -4.86% | 17.73% | -4.20% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 29.95% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | -18.66% | 8.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHQ and COMT is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019 | -0.19 |
The correlation between SCHQ and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to -0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHQ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
SCHQ
COMT
SCHQ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.27 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.89 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 6.43 | -5.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHQ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.13% | -51.89% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -17.57% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -17.57% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.93% | -29.00% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.38% | -11.44% | -25.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -23.96% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 5.15% | -2.22% |
Volatility
SCHQ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) is 2.37%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that SCHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 6.15% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.25% | 19.69% | -13.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.55% | 21.56% | -13.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 21.20% | -6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 18.86% | -3.62% |
SCHQ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHQ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than COMT's 5.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.96% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.82% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHQ and COMT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to SCHQ (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHQ dropped -46.13% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 11.81% vs -6.55% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 11.81% return vs -6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.96%, compared with 4.82% for SCHQ.
SCHQ is categorized as Government Bonds, while COMT is Commodities. SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHQ and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHQ and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer