SCHP vs. SCHX
SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.66%/yr vs 15.41%/yr for SCHX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHP vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 2.66%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.41% annualized return.
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
SCHP vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.61% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.20% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and SCHX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010 | -0.07 |
The correlation between SCHP and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHP vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHP
SCHX
SCHP vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.11 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 14.13 | -6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.34 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.79 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.85 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.85 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -34.33% | +20.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -9.02% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.48% | -19.04% | +14.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.26% | -25.41% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.26% | -34.33% | +20.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.27% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -3.97% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 1.98% | -1.35% |
Volatility
SCHP vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 0.89%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 2.86% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 9.03% | -6.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 11.98% | -8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 17.12% | -11.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 18.14% | -12.55% |
SCHP vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHP and SCHX have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHP vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHP and SCHX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to SCHP (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.41% vs 2.66% for SCHP. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.41% return vs 2.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP and SCHX have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 1.00% for SCHX.
SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHP and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer