SCHP vs. FXNAX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and FXNAX (Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund) are both funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while FXNAX is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.60%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for FXNAX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FXNAX.

Performance

SCHP vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has outperformed FXNAX with an annualized return of 2.60%, while FXNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.48% annualized return.

SCHP

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 4.14%
• 5Y*: 1.06%
• 10Y*: 2.60%

FXNAX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: -0.02%
• 10Y*: 1.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHP vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF	1.42%	6.76%	1.95%	3.91%	-12.02%	5.87%	10.86%	8.52%	-1.78%	3.02%
FXNAX Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund	0.50%	7.14%	1.35%	5.82%	-13.55%	-2.10%	7.63%	8.50%	0.04%	3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHP and FXNAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011	0.77

The correlation between SCHP and FXNAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCHP vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHP

SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 50
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FXNAX

FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHP vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHP	FXNAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.27	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.93	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	1.69	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.41	4.97	+2.43

SCHP vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHP and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHP vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and FXNAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHP	FXNAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.26%	-19.51%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.93%	-2.94%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.48%	-6.16%	+1.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.26%	-18.54%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.26%	-19.51%	+5.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-2.79%	+2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-3.86%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.64%	1.00%	-0.36%

Volatility

SCHP vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 1.02%, while Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHP	FXNAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.41%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	2.87%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	3.93%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.12%	6.08%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.59%	5.01%	+0.58%

SCHP vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHP vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than FXNAX's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXNAX Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund	3.70%	3.58%	3.40%	3.15%	1.81%	1.74%	2.92%	2.68%	2.74%	2.57%	2.76%	2.52%
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF	3.99%	4.06%	2.99%	3.02%	7.19%	4.39%	1.11%	2.02%	2.26%	1.90%	1.38%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHP and FXNAX in my portfolio?

SCHP and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHP or FXNAX?

FXNAX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.