SCHP vs. FNDE
SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.60%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for FNDE. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDE.
Performance
SCHP vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than FNDE's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed FNDE with an annualized return of 2.60%, while FNDE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
FNDE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
SCHP vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 13.70% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | 14.41% | -2.77% | 19.75% | -10.37% | 26.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and FNDE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, SCHP and FNDE have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SCHP vs. FNDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHP
FNDE
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHP
FNDE
Financial Services
SCHP
FNDE
Basic Materials
SCHP
-
FNDE
Communication Services
SCHP
-
FNDE
Consumer Defensive
SCHP
-
FNDE
Energy
SCHP
-
FNDE
Healthcare
SCHP
-
FNDE
Industrials
SCHP
-
FNDE
Real Estate
SCHP
-
FNDE
Technology
SCHP
-
FNDE
Utilities
SCHP
-
FNDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHP vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank
SCHP
FNDE
SCHP vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHP | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.93 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 10.67 | -3.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum FNDE drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and FNDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHP | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -43.55% | +29.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -10.23% | +8.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.48% | -18.40% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.26% | -29.44% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.26% | -39.93% | +25.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -3.19% | +2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -11.69% | +7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 2.80% | -2.16% |
Volatility
SCHP vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 1.02%, while Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHP | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 6.30% | -5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 13.07% | -10.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 15.61% | -12.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 17.01% | -10.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 19.30% | -13.71% |
SCHP vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHP vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than FNDE's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 3.68% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHP and FNDE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDE has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs FNDE's -43.55%.
On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 11.35% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.68% for FNDE.
SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while FNDE is Emerging Markets Equities. SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while FNDE tracks Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHP and 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHP and FNDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer