SCHO vs. GGOV
SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGOV.
Performance
SCHO vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.75% return.
SCHO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.84%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
GGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHO vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.42% | 2.41% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.75% | -2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHO and GGOV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHO vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHO
GGOV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHO vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHO | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.59 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHO vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and GGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHO | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -4.69% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -1.06% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -1.57% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHO vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHO | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40% | 5.28% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.99% | 5.28% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 5.28% | -3.72% |
SCHO vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHO vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison
SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHO and GGOV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
SCHO is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHO and 0.39% for GGOV.
Find the right allocation for SCHO and GGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer