SCHO vs. FSHBX
SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) are both funds - SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while FSHBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, SCHO returned 1.68%/yr vs 2.08%/yr for FSHBX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FSHBX.
Performance
SCHO vs. FSHBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than FSHBX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHO has underperformed FSHBX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while FSHBX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.08% annualized return.
SCHO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.84%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
FSHBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
SCHO vs. FSHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.42% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | -3.87% | -0.64% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 1.37% | 0.33% |
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 0.32% | 5.49% | 4.73% | 5.35% | -3.86% | -0.92% | 3.59% | 4.20% | 1.21% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHO and FSHBX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | 0.65 |
The correlation between SCHO and FSHBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHO vs. FSHBX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHO
FSHBX
SCHO vs. FSHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHO | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 2.89 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.59 | 10.74 | +3.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHO vs. FSHBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, smaller than the maximum FSHBX drawdown of -8.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and FSHBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHO | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -8.80% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.86% | -1.17% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.98% | -1.17% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.69% | -6.36% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.69% | -6.51% | +0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.42% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -1.04% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 0.32% | -0.11% |
Volatility
SCHO vs. FSHBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) is 0.49%, while Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) has a volatility of 0.64%. This indicates that SCHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHO | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.64% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | 1.45% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40% | 1.96% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.99% | 2.22% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 1.86% | -0.30% |
SCHO vs. FSHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSHBX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHO vs. FSHBX - Dividend Comparison
SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FSHBX's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 4.18% | 4.26% | 4.00% | 3.00% | 0.83% | 1.04% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.27% | 1.12% | 0.88% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHO and FSHBX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSHBX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to SCHO (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHO dropped -5.69% vs FSHBX's -8.80%.
SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHO and FSHBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer