PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHLX vs. SEMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHLX vs. SEMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) and DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHLX achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than SEMGX's 32.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHLX has underperformed SEMGX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while SEMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.54% annualized return.


SCHLX

1D
3.12%
1M
3.30%
YTD
-4.95%
6M
-4.34%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
7.47%

SEMGX

1D
-0.91%
1M
2.85%
YTD
32.36%
6M
35.75%
1Y
55.76%
3Y*
24.60%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHLX vs. SEMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHLX
DWS Health and Wellness Fund
-4.95%12.67%3.62%5.56%-7.22%15.43%15.40%22.40%3.50%19.37%
SEMGX
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
32.36%28.85%7.48%6.32%-21.66%-11.60%18.65%19.23%-12.25%37.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHLX and SEMGX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHLX and SEMGX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHLX vs. SEMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHLX
SCHLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SCHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMGX
SEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHLX vs. SEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) and DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHLXSEMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.52

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.58

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

14.48

-12.58

SCHLX vs. SEMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the SEMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHLX and SEMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHLXSEMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.88

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.28

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.52

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.27

+0.23

Drawdowns

SCHLX vs. SEMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHLX drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, smaller than the maximum SEMGX drawdown of -67.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHLX and SEMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHLXSEMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.46%

-67.21%

+21.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-16.11%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-18.37%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.62%

-41.31%

+22.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.47%

-45.82%

+18.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-1.08%

-7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-25.25%

+16.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

3.97%

+1.51%

Volatility

SCHLX vs. SEMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) is 5.14%, while DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that SCHLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHLXSEMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

8.18%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

16.85%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

20.06%

-5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

18.67%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

18.32%

-1.62%

SCHLX vs. SEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHLX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMGX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHLX vs. SEMGX - Dividend Comparison

SCHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than SEMGX's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHLX
DWS Health and Wellness Fund
5.48%5.21%1.19%5.29%1.77%9.02%9.13%9.88%11.48%6.52%2.84%16.39%
SEMGX
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.27%3.00%0.15%2.16%2.16%1.71%1.23%1.94%0.71%0.62%0.54%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHLX and SEMGX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEMGX has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to SCHLX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHLX dropped -45.46% vs SEMGX's -67.21%.

SEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHLX and SEMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer