SCHJ vs. CMU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU).

SCHJ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y). It was launched on Oct 10, 2019.

Performance

SCHJ vs. CMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCHJ vs. CMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	0.09%	6.80%	4.89%	6.36%	-5.73%	-0.67%	5.30%	0.61%
CMU MFS High Yield Municipal Trust	2.84%	5.39%	11.56%	10.28%	-27.23%	7.38%	-2.18%	1.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than CMU's 2.84% return.

SCHJ

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 5.39%
• 5Y*: 2.36%
• 10Y*: —

CMU

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 6.13%
• 1Y: 7.66%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: 2.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. CMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ

SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 93
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CMU

CMU Risk / Return Rank: 61
CMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CMU Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CMU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. CMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHJ	CMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	0.75	+1.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	1.01	+2.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.16	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	0.92	+2.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.74	2.64	+11.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHJ vs. CMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the CMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and CMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHJ	CMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	0.75	+1.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.02	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.12	+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and CMU is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SCHJ vs. CMU - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than CMU's 5.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	4.50%	4.42%	4.00%	2.98%	1.64%	0.94%	2.54%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CMU MFS High Yield Municipal Trust	5.48%	5.38%	4.69%	4.05%	5.58%	4.52%	4.93%	4.81%	6.09%	5.87%	6.13%	6.22%

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. CMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum CMU drawdown of -57.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and CMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHJ	CMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.62%	-57.31%	+43.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.47%	-8.68%	+7.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.43%	-37.25%	+27.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-8.66%	+7.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-13.04%	+11.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	3.02%	-2.66%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. CMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.87%, while MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHJ	CMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.87%	4.02%	-3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.28%	6.34%	-5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28%	10.32%	-8.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.92%	12.36%	-9.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.18%	14.68%	-10.50%