CMU vs. TRIN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN).

Performance

CMU vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMU vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CMU MFS High Yield Municipal Trust	2.84%	5.39%	11.56%	10.28%	-27.23%	5.74%
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc.	4.35%	16.01%	14.83%	53.97%	-26.60%	27.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CMU : $90.75M TRIN : $1.14B
EPS CMU : $0.49 TRIN : $1.91
PE Ratio CMU : 7.26 TRIN : 7.73
PS Ratio CMU : 6.91 TRIN : 3.78
PB Ratio CMU : 0.94 TRIN : 1.04
Total Revenue (TTM) CMU : $13.13M TRIN : $279.97M
Gross Profit (TTM) CMU : $11.20M TRIN : $228.11M
EBITDA (TTM) CMU : $23.14M TRIN : $98.03M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMU achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than TRIN's 4.35% return.

CMU

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 6.13%
• 1Y: 7.66%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: 2.02%

TRIN

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 6M: 4.11%
• 1Y: 9.31%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 15.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMU vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMU

CMU Risk / Return Rank: 61
CMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CMU Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CMU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

TRIN

TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 53
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMU vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMU	TRIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.41	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	0.71	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.09	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	0.79	+0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.64	1.75	+0.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMU vs. TRIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMU and TRIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMU	TRIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	0.41	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.58	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.53	-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between CMU and TRIN is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMU vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

CMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than TRIN's 13.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMU MFS High Yield Municipal Trust	5.48%	5.38%	4.69%	4.05%	5.58%	4.52%	4.93%	4.81%	6.09%	5.87%	6.13%	6.22%
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc.	13.79%	13.92%	14.10%	14.04%	21.32%	7.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CMU vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMU drawdown since its inception was -57.31%, which is greater than TRIN's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU and TRIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMU	TRIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.31%	-43.12%	-14.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-14.99%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.25%	-43.12%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.66%	-11.33%	+2.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.04%	-9.13%	-3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	6.75%	-3.73%

Volatility

CMU vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) is 4.02%, while Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that CMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMU	TRIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	6.09%	-2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.34%	15.75%	-9.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	22.67%	-12.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.36%	26.33%	-13.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	26.94%	-12.26%

Financials