PortfoliosLab logo
CMU vs. TRIN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMU and TRIN is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CMU vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMU:

0.75

TRIN:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

CMU:

0.93

TRIN:

0.97

Omega Ratio

CMU:

1.14

TRIN:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

CMU:

0.29

TRIN:

0.84

Martin Ratio

CMU:

2.06

TRIN:

2.63

Ulcer Index

CMU:

3.40%

TRIN:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

CMU:

10.05%

TRIN:

21.52%

Max Drawdown

CMU:

-57.32%

TRIN:

-43.12%

Current Drawdown

CMU:

-18.31%

TRIN:

-9.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMU:

$85.31M

TRIN:

$943.90M

EPS

CMU:

$0.49

TRIN:

$2.23

PE Ratio

CMU:

6.83

TRIN:

6.55

PEG Ratio

CMU:

0.00

TRIN:

5.26

PS Ratio

CMU:

11.37

TRIN:

3.93

PB Ratio

CMU:

0.84

TRIN:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMU:

$6.83M

TRIN:

$233.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMU:

$5.52M

TRIN:

$200.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

CMU:

$9.72M

TRIN:

$198.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMU achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than TRIN's 3.97% return.


CMU

YTD

-3.07%

1M

0.01%

6M

-6.14%

1Y

7.50%

3Y*

1.48%

5Y*

0.51%

10Y*

2.68%

TRIN

YTD

3.97%

1M

0.21%

6M

6.21%

1Y

13.02%

3Y*

11.53%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFS High Yield Municipal Trust

Trinity Capital Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMU vs. TRIN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMU is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMU is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMU is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMU is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMU is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMU is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRIN is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRIN is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRIN is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRIN is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRIN is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRIN is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMU vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMU and TRIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CMU vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

CMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than TRIN's 14.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMU
MFS High Yield Municipal Trust
5.21%4.69%4.05%5.58%4.52%4.93%4.81%6.10%5.87%6.13%6.22%6.63%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
14.01%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMU vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMU drawdown since its inception was -57.32%, which is greater than TRIN's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU and TRIN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CMU vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) is 1.91%, while Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that CMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CMU vs. TRIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFS High Yield Municipal Trust and Trinity Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
3.11M
62.67M
(CMU) Total Revenue
(TRIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items