CMU vs. TRIN
CMU (MFS High Yield Municipal Trust) and TRIN (Trinity Capital Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMU vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CMU
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRIN
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 25.76%
- YTD
- 38.29%
- 1Y
- 49.23%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 21.59%
- 10Y*
- —
CMU vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU MFS High Yield Municipal Trust | 0.53% | 5.39% | 11.56% | 10.28% | -27.23% | 5.03% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 38.29% | 16.01% | 14.83% | 53.97% | -26.60% | 36.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMU and TRIN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
CMU:
$85.66M
TRIN:
$1.32B
CMU:
$0.49
TRIN:
$1.99
CMU:
6.85
TRIN:
8.90
CMU:
6.52
TRIN:
4.97
CMU:
0.89
TRIN:
1.27
CMU:
$13.13M
TRIN:
$276.05M
CMU:
$11.20M
TRIN:
$219.75M
CMU:
$23.14M
TRIN:
$195.35M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMU vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank
CMU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRIN
CMU vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMU | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMU vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMU | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -43.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.04% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.78% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.96% | — |
Volatility
CMU vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMU | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.16% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 26.78% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 26.95% | — |
Dividends
CMU vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison
CMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, less than TRIN's 18.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU MFS High Yield Municipal Trust | 7.48% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 4.05% | 5.58% | 4.52% | 4.93% | 4.81% | 6.09% | 5.87% | 6.13% | 6.22% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 18.03% | 13.92% | 14.10% | 14.04% | 21.32% | 7.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CMU vs. TRIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFS High Yield Municipal Trust and Trinity Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CMU and TRIN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CMU and TRIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer