SCHI vs. VB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SCHI (Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHI is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate (5-10 Y), while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHI returned 1.14%/yr vs 6.98%/yr for VB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.

Performance

SCHI vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHI achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.33% return.

SCHI

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 5.52%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: 1.14%
• 10Y*: —

VB

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 6M: 13.69%
• 1Y: 28.72%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 6.98%
• 10Y*: 11.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHI vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHI Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF	0.37%	9.47%	3.32%	8.97%	-14.06%	-1.85%	9.74%	0.83%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.33%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	10.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHI and VB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019	0.26

The correlation between SCHI and VB shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHI vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHI	VB
Financial Services	28.9%	12.6%
Utilities	9.0%	3.3%
Technology	8.8%	17.2%
Healthcare	7.9%	11.1%
Industrials	6.2%	20.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	11.3%
Communication Services	5.5%	3.1%
Energy	5.0%	4.7%
Real Estate	4.9%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	3.4%
Basic Materials	1.6%	4.8%

Return for Risk

SCHI vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHI

SCHI Risk / Return Rank: 43
SCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 43

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 64
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHI vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHI	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.73	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.47	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	3.21	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	11.80	-5.77

SCHI vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHI and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHI vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHI drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHI and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHI	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.67%	-59.56%	+38.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.01%	-8.98%	+5.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.14%	-25.36%	+19.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.67%	-28.15%	+7.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	0.00%	-1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-8.43%	+2.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	2.44%	-1.52%

Volatility

SCHI vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) is 1.49%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that SCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHI	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	5.41%	-3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.19%	12.24%	-9.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	16.68%	-12.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.66%	20.80%	-14.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.39%	21.44%	-14.05%

SCHI vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHI and VB have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHI vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

SCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHI Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF	5.04%	4.99%	5.11%	4.27%	3.10%	1.93%	2.31%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.18%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHI and VB in my portfolio?

SCHI and VB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHI or VB?

VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SCHI (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHI dropped -20.67% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which ETF is better, SCHI or VB?

On 5-year performance, VB leads with 6.98% vs 1.14% for SCHI. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHI or VB?

Over the 5-year period, VB has performed better with a 6.98% return vs 1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHI or VB?

SCHI and VB have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHI or VB?

SCHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 1.18% for VB.

What is the main difference between SCHI and VB?

SCHI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHI tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate (5-10 Y), while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.