PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHI vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHI vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHI achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.35% return.


SCHI

1D
0.18%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*

FNDX

1D
0.68%
1M
3.54%
YTD
15.35%
6M
15.57%
1Y
33.72%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHI vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.37%9.47%3.32%8.97%-14.06%-1.85%9.74%1.00%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
15.35%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHI and FNDX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.22

The correlation between SCHI and FNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHI vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHI
FNDX

Financial Services

33.5%
14.1%

Technology

9.8%
19.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.0%

Communication Services

6.7%
10.1%

Utilities

6.2%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
9.2%

Energy

5.4%
10.3%

Industrials

5.1%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
7.4%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.7%

Financial Services

SCHI
33.5%
FNDX
14.1%

Technology

SCHI
9.8%
FNDX
19.1%

Healthcare

SCHI
8.9%
FNDX
12.0%

Communication Services

SCHI
6.7%
FNDX
10.1%

Utilities

SCHI
6.2%
FNDX
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHI
5.6%
FNDX
9.2%

Energy

SCHI
5.4%
FNDX
10.3%

Industrials

SCHI
5.1%
FNDX
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

SCHI
3.5%
FNDX
7.4%

Real Estate

SCHI
2.7%
FNDX
1.8%

Basic Materials

SCHI
1.1%
FNDX
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHI vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHI
SCHI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHI vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHIFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.61

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

5.59

-3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

21.88

-15.34

SCHI vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHI and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHIFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

3.32

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.86

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.80

-0.50

Drawdowns

SCHI vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHI drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHI and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHIFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-37.72%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-6.06%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-16.30%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-19.06%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

0.00%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-3.55%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

1.55%

-0.66%

Volatility

SCHI vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) is 1.32%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that SCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHIFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

2.15%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

7.27%

-4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

10.22%

-6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

15.18%

-8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.40%

17.50%

-10.10%

SCHI vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHI has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHI vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

SCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than FNDX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.44%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
5.04%4.99%5.11%4.27%3.10%1.93%2.31%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHI and FNDX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDX has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to SCHI (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHI dropped -20.67% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 5-year performance, FNDX leads with 12.98% vs 1.29% for SCHI. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 1.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

SCHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 1.44% for FNDX.

SCHI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHI tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate (5-10 Y), while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHI and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHI and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer