SCHF vs. IVV
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.24%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
SCHF vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 10.24%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
SCHF vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 12.60% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and IVV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SCHF and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHF vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
IVV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
SCHF
IVV
Technology
SCHF
IVV
Industrials
SCHF
IVV
Healthcare
SCHF
IVV
Basic Materials
SCHF
IVV
Energy
SCHF
IVV
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
IVV
Communication Services
SCHF
IVV
Utilities
SCHF
IVV
Real Estate
SCHF
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
IVV
SCHF vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.81 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 12.97 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.07 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.80 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.85 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -55.25% | +20.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -8.89% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -18.75% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -24.53% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -33.90% | -0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -2.67% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -10.77% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 1.92% | +1.05% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.77%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 3.77% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 9.31% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 12.08% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 16.92% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 18.07% | -0.84% |
SCHF vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHF vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.04% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and IVV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to IVV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 10.24% for SCHF. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer