SCHF vs. AVEM
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index while AVEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHF returned 10.24%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for AVEM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVEM.
Performance
SCHF vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 29.38% return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 32.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
AVEM
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 29.38%
- 6M
- 31.57%
- 1Y
- 57.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHF vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 16.56% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 7.04% |
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 29.38% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | 5.16% | 14.39% | 11.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and AVEM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SCHF and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHF vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
AVEM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
SCHF
AVEM
Technology
SCHF
AVEM
Industrials
SCHF
AVEM
Basic Materials
SCHF
AVEM
Healthcare
SCHF
AVEM
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
AVEM
Energy
SCHF
AVEM
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
AVEM
Communication Services
SCHF
AVEM
Real Estate
SCHF
AVEM
Utilities
SCHF
AVEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
AVEM
SCHF vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHF | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.98 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 3.80 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.50 | -1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.70 | 17.88 | -6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHF | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.98 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.57 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.67 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, roughly equal to the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and AVEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -36.05% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -13.13% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -18.02% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -34.00% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -10.10% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.30% | -0.35% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is 5.73%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that SCHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 8.14% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 16.64% | -3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 19.40% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.33% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 20.55% | -3.36% |
SCHF vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHF vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than AVEM's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.95% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.93% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and AVEM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVEM has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to SCHF (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs AVEM's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, AVEM leads with 10.44% vs 10.24% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVEM.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.95% for AVEM.
SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.33% for AVEM.
AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and AVEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer