PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHE vs. GEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHE vs. GEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHE achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than GEM's 17.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHE has underperformed GEM with an annualized return of 8.21%, while GEM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.


SCHE

1D
-4.07%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.81%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
8.21%

GEM

1D
-6.50%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
17.92%
6M
19.76%
1Y
40.69%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHE vs. GEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
7.33%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%32.70%
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
17.92%33.43%6.66%11.82%-21.33%-0.19%13.23%17.79%-14.25%36.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHE and GEM is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.96

The correlation between SCHE and GEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHE vs. GEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHE
GEM

Technology

30.8%
14.1%

Financial Services

13.6%
34.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
13.0%

Communication Services

5.2%
4.5%

Industrials

4.9%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
8.7%

Energy

3.1%
1.3%

Healthcare

2.8%
5.4%

Utilities

2.1%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.5%

Technology

SCHE
30.8%
GEM
14.1%

Financial Services

SCHE
13.6%
GEM
34.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHE
8.9%
GEM
13.0%

Communication Services

SCHE
5.2%
GEM
4.5%

Industrials

SCHE
4.9%
GEM
7.5%

Basic Materials

SCHE
3.9%
GEM
8.7%

Energy

SCHE
3.1%
GEM
1.3%

Healthcare

SCHE
2.8%
GEM
5.4%

Utilities

SCHE
2.1%
GEM
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

SCHE
2.0%
GEM
4.2%

Real Estate

SCHE
1.0%
GEM
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHE vs. GEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GEM
GEM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHE vs. GEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHEGEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.03

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

11.58

-4.04

SCHE vs. GEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHE Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the GEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHE and GEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHEGEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.98

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.35

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.47

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.48

-0.25

Drawdowns

SCHE vs. GEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHE drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, roughly equal to the maximum GEM drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHE and GEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHEGEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-37.02%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-13.50%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

-16.54%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-35.21%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-37.02%

+0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-8.52%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-12.00%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.52%

-0.38%

Volatility

SCHE vs. GEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) is 6.56%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that SCHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHEGEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

10.56%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.22%

18.37%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

20.62%

-3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

17.94%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

19.14%

+0.36%

SCHE vs. GEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than GEM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHE vs. GEM - Dividend Comparison

SCHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than GEM's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.95%2.30%2.58%2.97%2.96%3.00%1.63%3.13%2.08%1.81%1.98%0.25%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.68%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SCHE and GEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GEM has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to SCHE (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHE dropped -36.20% vs GEM's -37.02%.

On 10-year performance, GEM leads with 8.97% vs 8.21% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHE has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GEM has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GEM.

SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.95% for GEM.

SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while GEM tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHE and 0.45% for GEM.

GEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHE and GEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer