SCHD vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and PYLD (PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. SCHD is passively managed, while PYLD is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHD returned 24.22% vs 7.32% for PYLD. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.

Performance

SCHD vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 1.48% return.

SCHD

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 17.13%
• 6M: 17.00%
• 1Y: 24.22%
• 3Y*: 13.38%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

PYLD

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 7.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	17.13%	4.34%	11.66%	8.19%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.48%	9.57%	7.69%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and PYLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.27

Return for Risk

SCHD vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 71
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHD	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.40	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.52	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.48	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.27	2.26	+3.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.86	10.26	+2.59

SCHD vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHD	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.37%	-4.52%	-28.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.61%	-3.25%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-0.23%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-0.65%	-2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	0.71%	+1.18%

Volatility

SCHD vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.13%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHD	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	1.13%	+2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	2.60%	+5.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.07%	3.06%	+8.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	3.99%	+10.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	3.99%	+12.74%

SCHD vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHD vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than PYLD's 6.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.26%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.31%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHD and PYLD in my portfolio?

SCHD and PYLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHD or PYLD?

SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to PYLD (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

Which ETF is better, SCHD or PYLD?

On 1-year performance, SCHD leads with 24.22% vs 7.32% for PYLD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, PYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHD or PYLD?

Over the 1-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 24.22% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHD or PYLD?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHD or PYLD?

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 3.31% for SCHD.

What is the main difference between SCHD and PYLD?

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.55% for PYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.