PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 12.32%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.61%
6M
15.19%
YTD
21.36%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
12.32%
ALL TIME*
13.25%

MOAT

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.94%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
2.49%
1Y
11.94%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
13.39%
ALL TIME*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
21.36%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
2.49%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and MOAT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and MOAT has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHD vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
MOAT

Healthcare

20.8%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

20.6%
18.2%

Energy

14.1%

-

Technology

12.7%
30.8%

Financial Services

9.9%
9.2%

Industrials

7.8%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
11.1%

Communication Services

6.2%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Healthcare

SCHD
20.8%
MOAT
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
20.6%
MOAT
18.2%

Energy

SCHD
14.1%
MOAT

-

Technology

SCHD
12.7%
MOAT
30.8%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.9%
MOAT
9.2%

Industrials

SCHD
7.8%
MOAT
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
7.7%
MOAT
11.1%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.2%
MOAT
2.4%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
MOAT

-

Utilities

SCHD
0.1%
MOAT

-

Real Estate

SCHD

-

MOAT
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHDMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.15

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.59

0.97

+4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

2.86

+10.78

SCHD vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, roughly equal to the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-33.31%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-12.43%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-21.44%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-23.96%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-33.31%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.42%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-3.82%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

4.18%

-2.29%

Volatility

SCHD vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.60%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

10.40%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

13.95%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

18.26%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

18.61%

-1.90%

SCHD vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHD vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than MOAT's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.32%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.20%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and MOAT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to MOAT (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.39% vs 12.32% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.39% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.32% for MOAT.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.47% for MOAT.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer