SCHD vs. HSGFX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) are both funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while HSGFX is a Long-Short fund managed by Hussman Funds. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs -2.67%/yr for HSGFX. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for HSGFX.

Performance

SCHD vs. HSGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than HSGFX's -6.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed HSGFX with an annualized return of 12.91%, while HSGFX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.67% annualized return.

SCHD

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 20.66%
• 6M: 19.57%
• 1Y: 26.72%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 8.75%
• 10Y*: 12.91%

HSGFX

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: -6.15%
• 6M: -7.07%
• 1Y: -14.76%
• 3Y*: -3.11%
• 5Y*: -2.88%
• 10Y*: -2.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. HSGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	20.66%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	29.87%	15.03%	27.29%	-5.56%	20.85%
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	-6.15%	6.24%	-6.99%	-11.60%	17.33%	-0.23%	14.52%	-18.87%	8.78%	-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and HSGFX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	-0.51

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SCHD and HSGFX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.51 to -0.06, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Return for Risk

SCHD vs. HSGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 87
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

HSGFX

HSGFX Risk / Return Rank: 0
HSGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. HSGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHD	HSGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	-1.22	+3.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	-1.82	+5.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	0.81	+0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.70	-0.79	+6.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.97	-1.58	+15.55

SCHD vs. HSGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the HSGFX Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and HSGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. HSGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum HSGFX drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and HSGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHD	HSGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.37%	-60.61%	+27.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.61%	-18.43%	+13.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.13%	-24.22%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.85%	-24.22%	+7.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.37%	-33.41%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-55.29%	+55.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-26.88%	+23.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	9.18%	-7.29%

Volatility

SCHD vs. HSGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHD	HSGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	5.27%	-2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.53%	9.70%	-2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.93%	11.89%	-0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	11.22%	+3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	10.78%	+5.94%

SCHD vs. HSGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HSGFX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHD vs. HSGFX - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than HSGFX's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	2.48%	2.33%	3.00%	3.10%	1.08%	0.42%	0.16%	1.84%	1.19%	0.50%	0.28%	0.56%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.22%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHD and HSGFX in my portfolio?

SCHD and HSGFX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHD or HSGFX?

HSGFX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs HSGFX's -60.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.