PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. EEMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHD having a 19.96% return and EEMV slightly higher at 20.09%. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 12.83%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.04% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.87%
YTD
19.96%
6M
18.54%
1Y
25.99%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
12.83%

EEMV

1D
2.55%
1M
7.71%
YTD
20.09%
6M
21.21%
1Y
27.78%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
7.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.96%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
20.09%13.45%7.98%7.75%-13.94%5.05%6.90%7.83%-5.81%27.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and EEMV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and EEMV has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHD vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
EEMV

Technology

19.4%
36.5%

Consumer Defensive

18.5%
5.6%

Healthcare

18.4%
5.4%

Energy

14.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

9.1%
18.0%

Industrials

7.4%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
6.2%

Communication Services

6.0%
10.1%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.9%

Utilities

0.0%
4.4%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

SCHD
19.4%
EEMV
36.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
18.5%
EEMV
5.6%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.4%
EEMV
5.4%

Energy

SCHD
14.6%
EEMV
3.6%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.1%
EEMV
18.0%

Industrials

SCHD
7.4%
EEMV
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.7%
EEMV
6.2%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.0%
EEMV
10.1%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
EEMV
2.9%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
EEMV
4.4%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

EEMV
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHDEEMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.66

3.03

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.87

10.90

+2.97

SCHD vs. EEMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the EEMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and EEMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and EEMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDEEMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-31.56%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-9.22%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-12.47%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-21.90%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-31.56%

-1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

0.00%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-7.96%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.56%

-0.68%

Volatility

SCHD vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.14%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDEEMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

8.16%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

13.51%

-5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

14.67%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

12.22%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

13.99%

+2.73%

SCHD vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than EEMV's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
3.07%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.24%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and EEMV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to SCHD (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs EEMV's -31.56%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.83% vs 7.04% for EEMV. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 3.07% for EEMV.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while EEMV is Asia Pacific Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.25% for EEMV.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and EEMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer