PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 12.64%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
2.02%
YTD
18.75%
6M
18.75%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
12.64%

DGRW

1D
-1.94%
1M
0.85%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.39%
1Y
19.75%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
13.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.75%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
7.74%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and DGRW is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and DGRW has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHD vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
DGRW

Consumer Defensive

19.2%
6.7%

Healthcare

18.8%
12.8%

Technology

16.4%
32.1%

Energy

16.2%
5.0%

Financial Services

9.3%
11.3%

Industrials

7.5%
9.9%

Communication Services

6.3%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
7.1%

Basic Materials

1.2%
3.3%

Utilities

0.0%
0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
DGRW
6.7%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
DGRW
12.8%

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
DGRW
32.1%

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
DGRW
5.0%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
DGRW
11.3%

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
DGRW
9.9%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
DGRW
7.1%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
DGRW
3.3%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
DGRW
0.2%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

DGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHDDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.07

2.39

+3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

10.45

+4.45

SCHD vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHDDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.97

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.85

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.86

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.85

+0.01

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-32.04%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-8.30%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-16.21%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-17.27%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-32.04%

-1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-2.06%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-3.01%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.89%

-0.01%

Volatility

SCHD vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.87%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.05%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

7.92%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

10.09%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

13.99%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

16.22%

+0.50%

SCHD vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHD vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and DGRW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to SCHD (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.95% vs 12.64% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.95% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.28% for DGRW.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer