SCHD vs. CAIQ
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CAIQ.
Performance
SCHD vs. CAIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly higher than CAIQ's 12.96% return.
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
CAIQ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD vs. CAIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.96% | 2.90% |
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.96% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and CAIQ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. CAIQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHD vs. CAIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. CAIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than CAIQ's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and CAIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -9.06% | -24.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.52% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -1.70% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHD vs. CAIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 13.91% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 13.91% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 13.91% | +2.81% |
SCHD vs. CAIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIQ's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. CAIQ - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than CAIQ's 8.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.50% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and CAIQ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 3.24% for SCHD.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while CAIQ is Nasdaq-100. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.74% for CAIQ.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and CAIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer