SCHD vs. BALT
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and BALT (Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while BALT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHD returned 9.54%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for BALT. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BALT.
Performance
SCHD vs. BALT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's 2.78% return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 30.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
BALT
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.85M | $18.00M | $16.07M | |
| $786.88M | $715.86M | $685.58M |
SCHD vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 24.03% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 8.60% |
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF | 2.78% | 6.65% | 9.98% | 7.45% | 2.54% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and BALT is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and BALT has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHD vs. BALT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
BALT
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
SCHD
BALT
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
BALT
Energy
SCHD
BALT
Technology
SCHD
BALT
Financial Services
SCHD
BALT
Industrials
SCHD
BALT
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
BALT
Communication Services
SCHD
BALT
Basic Materials
SCHD
BALT
Utilities
SCHD
BALT
Real Estate
SCHD
-
BALT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
BALT
SCHD vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.62 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.74 | 5.71 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.01 | 21.02 | -4.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and BALT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -4.89% | -28.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -1.15% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -4.89% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -4.89% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | 0.00% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -0.34% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 0.31% | +1.51% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.80%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 0.80% | +3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 1.49% | +6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 2.27% | +8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 3.30% | +11.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 3.28% | +13.44% |
SCHD vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.13% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and BALT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to BALT (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs BALT's -4.89%.
On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 9.54% vs 5.98% for BALT. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BALT.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.00% for BALT.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while BALT is Defined Outcome. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while BALT tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.69% for BALT.
BALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and BALT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer