SCHB vs. IXG
SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) and IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while IXG is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHB returned 15.01%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for IXG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXG.
Performance
SCHB vs. IXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than IXG's 3.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHB has outperformed IXG with an annualized return of 15.01%, while IXG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.87% annualized return.
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
IXG
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 19.03%
- 3Y*
- 23.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
SCHB vs. IXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 9.68% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 3.78% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 14.97% | -8.97% | 25.07% | -2.99% | 24.60% | -16.33% | 23.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHB and IXG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SCHB and IXG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHB vs. IXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHB
IXG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SCHB
IXG
Financial Services
SCHB
IXG
Communication Services
SCHB
IXG
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHB
IXG
Industrials
SCHB
IXG
Healthcare
SCHB
IXG
Consumer Defensive
SCHB
IXG
-
Energy
SCHB
IXG
Real Estate
SCHB
IXG
-
Utilities
SCHB
IXG
-
Basic Materials
SCHB
IXG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHB vs. IXG — Risk / Return Rank
SCHB
IXG
SCHB vs. IXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHB | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 1.49 | +1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.44 | 5.26 | +7.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHB vs. IXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum IXG drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and IXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHB | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -78.42% | +43.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -11.33% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -13.54% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -27.20% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | -43.47% | +8.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | 0.00% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -19.73% | +15.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 3.21% | -1.22% |
Volatility
SCHB vs. IXG - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) at 4.30%. This indicates that SCHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHB | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.30% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 11.30% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 14.01% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 17.38% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 20.12% | -1.77% |
SCHB vs. IXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IXG's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHB vs. IXG - Dividend Comparison
SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than IXG's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 1.97% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHB and IXG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHB has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to IXG (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs IXG's -78.42%.
On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.01% vs 12.87% for IXG. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXG.
IXG has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.03% for SCHB.
SCHB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IXG is Financials Equities. SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.46% for IXG.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHB and IXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer