PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHB vs. EQL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHB vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHB having a 10.58% return and EQL slightly higher at 10.71%. Over the past 10 years, SCHB has outperformed EQL with an annualized return of 14.63%, while EQL has yielded a comparatively lower 12.39% annualized return.


SCHB

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.21%
6M
8.84%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
14.63%
ALL TIME*
14.17%

EQL

1D
0.57%
1M
1.13%
6M
6.82%
YTD
10.71%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.33M$2.84M$2.70M
$212.56M$205.35M$255.93M

SCHB vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
10.58%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
10.71%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-6.12%18.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHB and EQL is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.92

The correlation between SCHB and EQL shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHB vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHB
EQL

Technology

35.8%
10.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
9.1%

Industrials

9.8%
9.3%

Healthcare

9.6%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.6%

Communication Services

9.2%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
8.8%

Energy

3.2%
8.7%

Real Estate

2.4%
8.7%

Utilities

2.2%
9.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
8.0%

Technology

SCHB
35.8%
EQL
10.2%

Financial Services

SCHB
11.9%
EQL
9.1%

Industrials

SCHB
9.8%
EQL
9.3%

Healthcare

SCHB
9.6%
EQL
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHB
9.6%
EQL
9.6%

Communication Services

SCHB
9.2%
EQL
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCHB
4.4%
EQL
8.8%

Energy

SCHB
3.2%
EQL
8.7%

Real Estate

SCHB
2.4%
EQL
8.7%

Utilities

SCHB
2.2%
EQL
9.4%

Basic Materials

SCHB
1.9%
EQL
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHB vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHB vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHBEQLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.78

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

10.89

-1.36

SCHB vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHB and EQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHB vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and EQL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHBEQLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.27%

-35.65%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-6.19%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-15.07%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-19.24%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-35.65%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.27%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-3.23%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.58%

+0.50%

Volatility

SCHB vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.23%. This indicates that SCHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHBEQLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.23%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

7.03%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

9.50%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

14.51%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

16.49%

+1.83%

SCHB vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHB vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than EQL's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.35%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHB and EQL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to EQL (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs EQL's -35.65%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 14.63% vs 12.39% for EQL. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 14.63% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.

SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.27% for EQL.

EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHB and EQL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer