SCHA vs. XLI
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 11.39%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for XLI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
SCHA vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than XLI's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHA has underperformed XLI with an annualized return of 11.39%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.
SCHA
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
XLI
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
SCHA vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 21.09% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.23% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and XLI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SCHA and XLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHA vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
XLI
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Technology
SCHA
XLI
Industrials
SCHA
XLI
Financial Services
SCHA
XLI
-
Healthcare
SCHA
XLI
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
XLI
Real Estate
SCHA
XLI
-
Energy
SCHA
XLI
-
Basic Materials
SCHA
XLI
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
XLI
-
Utilities
SCHA
XLI
Communication Services
SCHA
XLI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
XLI
SCHA vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 1.90 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.27 | 7.47 | +7.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -62.26% | +19.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -12.21% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -18.49% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -21.64% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | -42.33% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.82% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -9.20% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.10% | -0.51% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) at 6.22%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 6.22% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 13.69% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 16.16% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 17.56% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 20.04% | +2.71% |
SCHA vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHA vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than XLI's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and XLI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to XLI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.09% vs 11.39% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLI.
XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.99% for SCHA.
SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XLI is Industrials Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.08% for XLI.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer