SCHA vs. HAUZ
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and HAUZ (Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while HAUZ is a REIT fund tracking the iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 11.55%/yr vs 4.01%/yr for HAUZ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for HAUZ.
Performance
SCHA vs. HAUZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 22.49% return, which is significantly higher than HAUZ's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHA has outperformed HAUZ with an annualized return of 11.55%, while HAUZ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.01% annualized return.
SCHA
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 22.49%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 41.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
HAUZ
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- -1.46%
- 10Y*
- 4.01%
SCHA vs. HAUZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 22.49% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | -0.58% | 22.70% | -5.44% | 6.29% | -22.24% | 9.82% | -6.23% | 20.89% | -9.12% | 27.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and HAUZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SCHA and HAUZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHA vs. HAUZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
HAUZ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
SCHA
HAUZ
Industrials
SCHA
HAUZ
Financial Services
SCHA
HAUZ
Healthcare
SCHA
HAUZ
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
HAUZ
Real Estate
SCHA
HAUZ
Energy
SCHA
HAUZ
Basic Materials
SCHA
HAUZ
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
HAUZ
Utilities
SCHA
HAUZ
Communication Services
SCHA
HAUZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. HAUZ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
HAUZ
SCHA vs. HAUZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | HAUZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.09 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | 0.43 | +3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 1.21 | +14.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. HAUZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than HAUZ's maximum drawdown of -39.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and HAUZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | HAUZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -39.51% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -14.08% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -17.88% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -34.26% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | -39.51% | -2.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.86% | +9.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -11.75% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 5.04% | -2.45% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. HAUZ - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) at 4.34%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAUZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | HAUZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 4.34% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 11.67% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 14.02% | +4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 15.97% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 16.97% | +5.78% |
SCHA vs. HAUZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HAUZ's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHA vs. HAUZ - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than HAUZ's 4.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | 4.49% | 4.46% | 4.50% | 3.50% | 1.99% | 4.84% | 3.37% | 3.69% | 1.93% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 9.42% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and HAUZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to HAUZ (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs HAUZ's -39.51%.
On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.55% vs 4.01% for HAUZ. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, HAUZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HAUZ.
HAUZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.98% for SCHA.
SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HAUZ is REIT. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.10% for HAUZ.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and HAUZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer