SCHA vs. CVSM
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SCHA is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.
Performance
SCHA vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCHA
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 1Y
- 33.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
CVSM
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 5.65% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and CVSM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHA vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and CVSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -3.36% | -39.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -1.46% | -3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -1.01% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHA vs. CVSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.07% | 11.19% | +7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 11.19% | +10.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 11.19% | +11.55% |
SCHA vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHA vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and CVSM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.55% for CVSM.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and CVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer