SCFZX vs. PBHAX
SCFZX (PGIM Securitized Credit Fund) and PBHAX (PGIM High Yield Fund) are both mutual funds - SCFZX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while PBHAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, SCFZX returned 5.28%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for PBHAX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCFZX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PBHAX.
Performance
SCFZX vs. PBHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCFZX achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly higher than PBHAX's 1.69% return.
SCFZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- —
PBHAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
SCFZX vs. PBHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 2.28% | 5.75% | 9.41% | 8.67% | -0.84% | 5.27% | -0.33% | 1.73% |
PBHAX PGIM High Yield Fund | 1.69% | 8.79% | 6.89% | 10.75% | -12.51% | 5.63% | 4.87% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCFZX and PBHAX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SCFZX and PBHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCFZX vs. PBHAX — Risk / Return Rank
SCFZX
PBHAX
SCFZX vs. PBHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) and PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCFZX | PBHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.09 | 2.15 | +1.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 17.53 | 3.72 | +13.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.28 | 1.54 | +4.73 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.02 | 3.08 | +16.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 69.95 | 15.43 | +54.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCFZX | PBHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.09 | 2.15 | +1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.78 | 0.66 | +2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SCFZX vs. PBHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCFZX drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum PBHAX drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCFZX and PBHAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCFZX | PBHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -28.80% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -2.48% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.93% | -4.06% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.13% | -16.22% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -2.87% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | 0.49% | -0.40% |
Volatility
SCFZX vs. PBHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) is 0.42%, while PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that SCFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCFZX | PBHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 1.16% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.03% | 2.71% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 3.56% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 5.06% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 5.49% | -2.14% |
SCFZX vs. PBHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCFZX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PBHAX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCFZX vs. PBHAX - Dividend Comparison
SCFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, less than PBHAX's 6.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBHAX PGIM High Yield Fund | 6.73% | 6.71% | 6.01% | 5.73% | 5.94% | 5.88% | 5.70% | 5.96% | 6.26% | 5.98% | 4.61% | 6.64% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 5.08% | 5.25% | 6.55% | 5.58% | 4.97% | 2.56% | 3.08% | 2.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCFZX and PBHAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBHAX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to SCFZX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCFZX dropped -17.20% vs PBHAX's -28.80%.
SCFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCFZX and PBHAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer